consignee show in any docs.

narisa · Post by **narisa** » Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:03 pm

Dear all
Can ISBP para 184 apply for documents other than c/o such as health cert,cert of fruit ...
thanks.

picant · Post by **picant** » Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:23 pm

Hi Pal,

I agree with suggested answer ISBP43 in G. Collyer FAQ volume V:

-Althoug the paragraph refers to Certificate of Origin, the principle would apply to other stipulated documents.-

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

LCstudent · Post by **LCstudent** » Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:36 pm

Dear Narisa ! I think we should take ISBP para 184 only in connection with Cert/Origin, but the word consignee in this document and in the transportdocument has among the L/C community a very different point of view/interpretation. I have seen Cert/Origins showing applicant in the respective field "Consignee", although transport doc.was issued in the consignee space: "to (the order of) Bank X (as opening bank)" - no rejection occured, less such one as per para 184, where consignee´s are to be identical.
Now the problem could be solved - unless L/C shows no contrary conditions -, if the named docs are issued/addressed "To whom it may concern". So You should avoid any discussions with banks. Other comments appreciated. Have a nice day. Rgds LCStudent.

21vita · Post by **21vita** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:05 pm

picant wrote: I agree with suggested answer ISBP43 in G. Collyer FAQ volume V:

-Althoug the paragraph refers to Certificate of Origin, the principle would apply to other stipulated documents.-

Ciao

Thanks , learning.
but Collyer's answer could have an effect as formal opinion?

consignee show in any docs.

consignee show in any docs.

faq volume v

consignee shown in any docs.

consignee show in any docs