Dear All,
May I ask your comment on the following case:
Quote
L/C terms:
46A: document required:
Cert. of Origin in duplicate.
47A:
Minor typographical error is acceptable.
Issuing bank cite the discrepancy of:
1. Cert. of Origin showing on board date 06/08/09 instead of 08/08/09
differ from B/L.
at the pre-print box “departure date”, Cert. of Origin showing 08/08/09
at the column of goods description, Cert. of Origin showing shipped on board Vessel XX on 06/08/09
Negotiating bank claimed that since typographical error is not treated as discrepancy.
L/C does not specifically request Cert. of Origin to show any detail such as shipment date, in the meantime, the departure date on Cert. of Origin is same as B/L. It is obviously the on board date is a typographical error.
Therefore, the discrepancy is invalid.
unquote
Please comment whether the discrepancy is valid or not.
Regards,
ucp 800
typographical error of on board date on Cert. of Origin
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:56 pm
- First Name: LEUNG
- Last Name: KING SANG
- Organization: WACHOVIA BANK N.A.
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- berry
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:36 pm
does it really matters
does it really matters what the certificate of origin says about 'on board' date. a certificate of origin may show even different references. i think its an additional information and should be disregarded.