Page 1 of 1

LC Requires B/L Without Indication On Board

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:36 pm
by TradeLaporte
Dear members
LC requires bill of lading straight consigned. Bill of lading missing on board notation and vessel name two vessels mentioned. Is discrepancy the bl do not mention on board date?
Your comments appreciated and provide reference article

Compulsory.....

Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:20 pm
by picant
Hi Pal,

even if straight consigned b/l must be shipped.
art 20 a ii and 21 a ii UCP 600 , if it multimodal and first leg is not by sea on board not necessary.
Ciao

Sligthly extended explanation

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2017 4:16 pm
by cristiand969
Hi,
As Picant indicated, the on board notation and consignee name are two different things
The on board notation is mandatory when first leg of carriage is by sea, namely field 44A (inland place) on swift message does not appear, but only 44E (port of loading)
Even so, giving the fact that B/L indicated two vessels iti is necessary that the onboard notation to bear in addition , the vessel name to which such notation refer
regards