shipped on deck clause

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
ucp800
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:56 pm
First Name: LEUNG
Last Name: KING SANG
Organization: WACHOVIA BANK N.A.
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

shipped on deck clause

Post by ucp800 » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:27 am

Dear Expert,

May I ask for your opinion of the following:



B/L bearing the chop showing the clause :

CARGO LOAD / UNLOAD, LASHED, MULTI STACKING, MODE ON STOWAGE
AND CARGO SHIPPED ON DECK AT SHIPPER’S RISK, THE CARRIER IS NOT
RESPONSIBLE FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE HOWEVER / WHATSOEVER CAUSED.

Please comment whether the discrepancy is valid or not?

For your reference:
Article 26 a. A transport document must not indicate that the goods are or will be loaded on deck. A clause on a transport document stating that the goods may be loaded on deck is acceptable.

Thank you for your assistance.

Regards,
ucp 600

malla
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:09 pm
First Name: malla
Last Name: reddy
Organization: IFTS
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

ITS DISCREPANT

Post by malla » Thu Feb 25, 2010 6:12 pm

Hi

its not acceptable though it shows at shipper's risk.therefore it is a clear discrepancy as per A(26).





malla

User avatar
berry
Posts: 329
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:36 pm

no discrepancy

Post by berry » Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:19 am

i feel it like a standard clause. the line does not expressly says that the cargo is loaded on deck rather covers may other issues. its a clause not to be considered.

Post Reply