Dear All,
Please refer to ISBP point 106 last line, '' A statement that the packaging "is not sufficient for the sea journey" would not be acceptabe.
1. this clause will be ignored if stated or
2. the documents will not be accepted bearing this clause.
Someone Please clarify.
Thanks.
Clean Bill of lading
-
ahmad
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:06 pm
- First Name: Ahmad
- Last Name: Naeem Jaswal
- Organization: NBP
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Islamabad, Pakistan
-
Lee
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:55 pm
- First Name: Lee
- Last Name: S
- Organization: AAA
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Clean Bill of lading.
Hi,
As per ISBP, If bill of lading states " packaging is not sufficient for the sea journey" ,
then the B/L is considered as claused B/L.
Document bearing this clause is not acceptable, when the LC requirement is CLEAN B/L.
In case, the B/L states " packaging may not be sufficient for the sea journey ",
still, B/L is acceptanble as CLEAN B/L., because it does not evidence that packing is not sufficient, it only states that it " may ", (i.e. not sure), so its acceptable.
As per ISBP, If bill of lading states " packaging is not sufficient for the sea journey" ,
then the B/L is considered as claused B/L.
Document bearing this clause is not acceptable, when the LC requirement is CLEAN B/L.
In case, the B/L states " packaging may not be sufficient for the sea journey ",
still, B/L is acceptanble as CLEAN B/L., because it does not evidence that packing is not sufficient, it only states that it " may ", (i.e. not sure), so its acceptable.
-
danohng
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:43 pm
- First Name: Daniel
- Last Name: Ng
- Organization: Citigroup
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Clean transport dox
"Packaging IS NOT sufficient for the journey" in it's face stated the defective of the Goods and is not acceptable regardless of whether the credit called for CLEAN transport document or not and should be quoted as discrepancy.