Dear all,
please help me to understand ICC opinion TA668
However, the document in question has no signature space. The structure of a courier receipt is not governed by the UCP; this is for each courier company to determine. The ICC Banking Commission cannot dictate that a signature is required when the courier company's document does not require such evidence.
should i count this that a courier receipt that do not have a signature space need not to be sign?
signature on courier receipt
-
Hussam
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 4:46 pm
- First Name: Hussam
- Last Name: Hammoudeh
- Organization: SGB
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
yes it should
Dear Sir
as per ICC UCP600 Article 25 courier receipt should be signed or stamped by the named courier
as per ICC UCP600 Article 25 courier receipt should be signed or stamped by the named courier
-
cristiand969
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- First Name: Cristian
- Last Name: D.
- Organization: Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: RO
Dear Hussam
.Hussam wrote:Dear Sir
as per ICC UCP600 Article 25 courier receipt should be signed or stamped by the named courier
A courier receipt without any box of signature usually bears at least a letterhead and a code bar.
.
Let's totally ignore opinion TA668 and stick only on UCP 600 as per your answer. In this case you have to agree that following UCP600 a signature may be a simbol or any other electronic method of authentication and the code bar can be interpeted as the issuer signature for the purpose of UCP600.
.
Look forward to having your opinion in this respect.