An on board notation is required because Chopsticks

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
ucp800
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:56 pm
First Name: LEUNG
Last Name: KING SANG
Organization: WACHOVIA BANK N.A.
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

An on board notation is required because Chopsticks

Post by ucp800 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:47 pm

Dear All,

An L/C subject to UCP 600 specifies:

A multimodal transport bill of lading;

Place of receipt: Macau;

Place of final destination: West Orange, New Jersey.

The multimodal transport bill of lading shows:


Place of Receipt
Macau

Vessel Name
Casino Royale


Port of Loading
Hong Kong

Intended Vessel Name
Chopsticks


Port of Discharge
New York

Place of Final Destination
West Orange, New Jersey


The issuing bank refuses payment due to one discrepancy:

“An on board notation is required because Chopsticks is an intended vessel only.”

Is this discrepancy valid?


Thank you for your assistance.

Regards,
ucp 800

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Same as previous

Post by cristiand969 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:00 pm

Pls consult art 19 a iii b of UCP 600.

Post Reply