Negotiation Vs Purchase
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:09 pm
- First Name: Masoom
- Last Name: Hasan
- Organization: .
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Negotiation Vs Purchase
Is there any difference between Negotiation and Purchase [Under Article 2 and Sub-Article 12 (b) of UCP 600]?
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:01 pm
- First Name: Hafizur
- Last Name: Rahman
- Organization: Southeast Bank Ltd
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Dhaka
Negotiation and Purchase
Art. 2 clearly defines: -
Accordingly I think these bear same meaning per UCP-600 since no other definition/explanation found in the publication.
.Negotiation means the purchase.............
Accordingly I think these bear same meaning per UCP-600 since no other definition/explanation found in the publication.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:09 pm
- First Name: Masoom
- Last Name: Hasan
- Organization: .
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Negotiation Vs. Purchase
Ok. If we take the clarification made by 'bdesh', then, is the word purchase mentioned in sub-article 12(b) similar to to the word purchase mentioned in article 2 of The UCP 600?
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:09 pm
- First Name: Masoom
- Last Name: Hasan
- Organization: .
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Prepay or purchase under sub-article 12 (b) and negotiation
Hi everybody,
Here I want to share some thoughts with you. According to sub-article 12(b) ofthe UCP 600,
Again according to the definition of 'Honour' under article 2
a. by accepatnce,
b. by deferred payment;
and in this case NB is allowed to advance fund only when it makes acceptance of the draft or incurs own deferred payment undertaking and it does not relates to advanicng fund when credit is availble "by negotiation".
Furthermore, I would like to quote here from the commentary of UCP 600 concerning explanation of sub-article 12(b):
i. prepay or purchase under sub-article 12(b) can be dubbed as discounting
ii. it can also be dubbed as negotiation
Awaiting for your particiation.
Thanks.
Here I want to share some thoughts with you. According to sub-article 12(b) ofthe UCP 600,
By nominating a bank to accept a draft or incur a deferred payment undertaking, an issuing bank authorizes that nominated bank to prepay or purchase a draft accepted or a deffered payment undertaking incurred by that nominated bank.
Again according to the definition of 'Honour' under article 2
So can we say that, according to sub-article 12(b) issuing bank (IB) allows the nominated bank (NB) to advance fund to the beneficary when credit availbale by:Honour means:
a. to pay at sight if the credit is available by sight payment.
b. to incur a deffered payment undertaking and pay at maturity if the credit is available by deferred payment.
c. to accetp a bill of exchange ('draft") drawn by the beneficiary and pay at maturity if the credit is availabel by acceptance.
a. by accepatnce,
b. by deferred payment;
and in this case NB is allowed to advance fund only when it makes acceptance of the draft or incurs own deferred payment undertaking and it does not relates to advanicng fund when credit is availble "by negotiation".
Furthermore, I would like to quote here from the commentary of UCP 600 concerning explanation of sub-article 12(b):
So eventually can we say:With this new sub-article, the rules provide for discount authorization simply by the issuing bank nominating a bank to accept a draft or incur a deferred payment undertaking. A bank nominated to negotiate is, by the definition of "negotiation" in UCP 600, as well as UCP 500, authorized to purchase a complying presentation (under UCP 500 to "gice value").
There is now no difference between the authorization to prepay or purchase a draft accepted or deferred payment undertaking incurred by a nominated bank and the authorization to negotiate, ie. to purchase a complying presentation.
i. prepay or purchase under sub-article 12(b) can be dubbed as discounting
ii. it can also be dubbed as negotiation
Awaiting for your particiation.
Thanks.