Clause "Received For Shipment " in the L/C

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
PKTee
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:01 am
First Name: Tee
Last Name: Poh Kong
Organization: Manufacturing
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

Clause "Received For Shipment " in the L/C

Post by PKTee » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:06 am

Dear All,

I am new in this forum.

I need to know what the meaning of the Clause in the L/C from my supplier which
ask me to include " Received for Shipment".

What is purpose of the clause and what is advantage and disadvantage to me ?

Anyone could help.... :-?

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Received for shipment

Post by picant » Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:29 pm

Hi Pal,

Received for shipment bill of ladind means that the Shipping Company/Carrier has taken up the goods, but not placed on board a determinated vessel. This is common in some INCOTERMS, when the doods are delivered before placed on board, i.e. EXW, FAS, FCA. Normally l/c required an "on Board" bill of lading, also in these INCOTERMS(Wrongly I dare say). However, if the l/c calls for a "Received for shipment bill of lading" you will provide such type of bill. No disavantage for you, and probably the buyer has arranged transport by a carier or a forwarder so acting, in a satisfactory way.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

User avatar
nesarul
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 9:46 pm
First Name: Nesarul
Last Name: Hoque
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

received for shipment

Post by nesarul » Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:42 pm

Dear Picant,
I personally don't think there is a correlation between incorterms and "received for shipment" (if any,pls help me to understand.... pls.......]

The obvious disadvantage of a received for shipment bill is that, unless it is converted to a shipped bill of lading, it provides no evidence of date of shipment.
.
Without shipment date, Treatment of insurance document if any, determining a maturity date from the date of shipment can not be established. more over applicant can not forecast about arrival of shipment followed by endanger itself to a great extent.
.
If i go on wrong track, pls correct me.
Regards
.
Nesar

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Incoterms 2000

Post by picant » Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:06 pm

Hi Pal,

EXW, FCA and FAS incoterms are clear about he place of goods delivery, before loading the marchandise, so the transport document you receive is "Received for shipment".
In this case, you are not sure that goods have been shipped, but the shipping company has controll on them. All depends on Sale Contract, not for the banks requirements(Banks or Domestic Laws).

This is naturally my own point of view.
Other comments appreciated

Ciao

User avatar
nesarul
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 9:46 pm
First Name: Nesarul
Last Name: Hoque
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

received for shipment

Post by nesarul » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:42 pm

Dear,
EXW, FCA and FAS incoterms are clear about he place of goods delivery, before loading the marchandise,
Yes I agree with that but that doesn't mean that
so the transport document you receive is "Received for shipment".
from my point of view.
Regards
Nesar

User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

transport document

Post by shahriar » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:30 pm

in my opinion, a incoterm has hardly anything to do with the transport document. for EXwork, i think we are not going to get any transport document. i would surely like to know that if the LC calls for a FAS and the presented bill of lading shows shipped on board, would that be a discrepancy? i dont think so. i in fact think even if the LC calls for a received for shipment bill of lading, a on board bill lading would be acceptable.
opinion appreciated :)

Post Reply