LC Requires B/L Without Indication On Board

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
TradeLaporte
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:40 pm
First Name: ART
Last Name: TRATADOLIBRE
Organization: Trade Co
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: United States

LC Requires B/L Without Indication On Board

Post by TradeLaporte » Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:36 pm

Dear members
LC requires bill of lading straight consigned. Bill of lading missing on board notation and vessel name two vessels mentioned. Is discrepancy the bl do not mention on board date?
Your comments appreciated and provide reference article

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Compulsory.....

Post by picant » Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:20 pm

Hi Pal,

even if straight consigned b/l must be shipped.
art 20 a ii and 21 a ii UCP 600 , if it multimodal and first leg is not by sea on board not necessary.
Ciao

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Sligthly extended explanation

Post by cristiand969 » Thu Jul 27, 2017 4:16 pm

Hi,
As Picant indicated, the on board notation and consignee name are two different things
The on board notation is mandatory when first leg of carriage is by sea, namely field 44A (inland place) on swift message does not appear, but only 44E (port of loading)
Even so, giving the fact that B/L indicated two vessels iti is necessary that the onboard notation to bear in addition , the vessel name to which such notation refer
regards

Post Reply