ICC Opinion 470/TA806 Rev

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

ICC Opinion 470/TA806 Rev

Post by picant » Sun Mar 22, 2015 9:48 pm

Hi Pals

Reading the Opinion concerning the fact that if the issuing bank requiresthat the presenting negotiating bank must confirm on the remittance letter covering schedule that the amount of the drawing has been endorsed on the reverse of the credit and the conclusion, I wonder as such request is not containing in the wording of the l/c but on the book 7 of Swift guidebook, where in the usage rules it is written:
-FOR FREELY NEGOTIABLE DOCUMENTARY CREDITS, IF THE RECEIVER DOES NOT FURTHER TRANSMIT THE CREDIT BY MT710, IT MUST ADD SENTENCES TO THE EFFECT THAT:
-THE ADVICE TO THE BENEFICIARY MUST BE PRESENTED AT EACH NEGOTIATION,
-THE NEGOTIATING BANK MUST NOTE EACH NEGOTIATION ON THAT ADVICE.......

Consideing that UCP 600 allows the documentary credit to be freely PAYABLE and ACCEPTABLE a review of these Usage Rules
should be necessary.
Then, I think that in a Foreign Department of a bvank doing international, people must know something more then its own section, Documents chekers should know Swift message, Forwarder rates etc to satsfy the need of customers.
Probably it happens only in little/medium banks, being the big bank so divided that one clerk has not idea of the work of the collegue near-by.
Up with little/medium bank.
Ciao

Post Reply