Which Date Should Be Counted As Bill Of Lading Date?

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
User avatar
gegeeee
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:50 pm
First Name: Gega CITF, CDCS
Last Name: Topadze
Organization: Bank of Georgia
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia

Which Date Should Be Counted As Bill Of Lading Date?

Post by gegeeee » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:20 pm

Hy Guys,

Need your experience and valuable opinion regarding one case.

In original LC we have such formulation: 2C: Drafts at... 90 DAYS AFTER B/L DATE.

Actually we received all doc's from confirming Bank, On B/L there are two dates: 1) Date of issue of b/l :23.12.2014
2) Shipped on board date: 21.12.2014. The confirming Bank calculated the maturity date from 23.12.2014 + 90 days.

Actually my opinion is that unless there was no indication, Drafts at... 90 DAYS AFTER B/L IssueDATE, confirming bank had to made calculation from 21.12.2014.

What can u suggest?

GUBAZ
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:45 am
First Name: ILYAS
Last Name: K.
Organization: BANK
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: TURKEY

B/L DATE

Post by GUBAZ » Fri Jan 30, 2015 3:50 pm

hi

ı definitely agree with you.As per UCP 600 maturity date must be start shipment date on b/l

Kiara
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 pm
First Name: Kiara
Last Name: Richardson
Organization: Banking
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Gibraltar

BL Date.

Post by Kiara » Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:06 pm

Gegeeee you are quite right, the confirming bank should have calculated maturity date from 21.12.14 +90 days (using the ship on board date)

If you refer to the ISBP under UCP 600 E6 (a) it states "when a pre=printed shipped on board bill of lading is presented, its issuance date will be deemed to be the date of shipment unless it bears a separate dated on board notation. In the latter event, such date will be deemed date of shipment whether that date is before or after issuance date of the bill of lading."

Hope it helps.
Kiara

User avatar
mijanlt23004
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 11:07 pm
First Name: Mijanur
Last Name: Rahman
Organization: Blckstone
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

BL Date

Post by mijanlt23004 » Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:57 pm

This issue is very clearly specified in ISBP 745 in B2 (c) i.e. when tenor refers to e.g. 60 days after the bill of lading date, the on board date deemed to be the bill of lading date even when the on board date is prior to or later than the date of issuance of bill of lading.
.
As such I completely agree with you.
Thanks

RAHULCH
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 7:56 am
First Name: RAHUL
Last Name: CHANDRAN
Organization: BANK
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: INDIA

ON BOARD date

Post by RAHULCH » Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:22 am

absolutely right the maturiy date has to be calculated from on board unless B/L mentions otherwise

User avatar
harlanadinata
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:23 am
First Name: ADINATA
Last Name: HARLAN
Organization: BNI 46
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: INDONESIA

BL date

Post by harlanadinata » Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:10 pm

Clearly stated in ucp art 20a ii, on board date will be considered as shipment date if mentioned in BL, therefore, the maturity calculation should be based on bl on board date. And then, confirming bank maturity calculation zhould

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Bill of lading date and bill of lading issuing date

Post by picant » Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:12 am

Hi Pal,

IMHO, if it is written "60 days after b/l's date, it is ok.
The problem when it is written "60 days after b/l's issuing date".
It is clear that the applicant wants pay 60 days after the issuing date of the b/l even if On Board date is prior of the date
of the b/l. This may causes a conflict, so it should be better to avoid or at least repeat this condition in field 47.
When using different wording as stated in ICC UCP or ISBP, the meaning may be differently interpreted.
We translate from Italian to English, and a Chinese from English to Mandarin using different nuances of a language.
Other comments appreciated
Ciao

mano
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:07 am
First Name: ahmed
Last Name: rabea
Organization: societe generale
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Egypt

b/l date

Post by mano » Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:53 pm

hello,


your questions is typically answered ISBP 745E PAR. B2-C
maturity calculation should be based on board date not issuance date (as per your case)

Regards
A.rabie

wahidkhan
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:57 pm
First Name: WAHID
Last Name: KHAN
Organization: BANK LIMITED
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: INDIA

Hi

Post by wahidkhan » Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:25 pm

Hi

I completely agree with you, it is clearly specified in ISBP 745 in B2 c , indicates if there is an pre printed or shipped on board mention on bill, this date will be considered to calculate the tenor. When there is no such indication BL date can be considered in that case.

Post Reply