Some Multiple Choice Questions For CDCS -3

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
cmzr
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:52 am
First Name: cem
Last Name: OZER
Organization: tibas
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: turkey

Some Multiple Choice Questions For CDCS -3

Post by cmzr » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:08 pm

Which of the following statements with regard to a revocable credit subject to UCP600 is correct?

a. A revocable credit may be amended but not cancelled by the issuing bank at any moment without prior notice to the beneficiary.
b. A revocable credit may be amended or cancelled by the issuing bank at any moment without prior notice to the beneficiary
c. A revocable credit can not be issued subject to UCP 600
d. A revocable credit must state in its terms under which conditions it may be amended or cancelled by the issuing bank.

User avatar
M.A.Chowdhury
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:22 pm
First Name: Monir
Last Name: Chowdhury
Organization: MTBL
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Contact:

Some questions

Post by M.A.Chowdhury » Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:16 am

Dear cmzr,

I think right answer is b.

Monir

cmzr
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:52 am
First Name: cem
Last Name: OZER
Organization: tibas
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: turkey

answer

Post by cmzr » Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:31 am

answer is d. but I think it's b. Any idea which support d?

maalsma
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:11 pm
First Name: Abdulrahaman
Last Name: Ahmed
Organization: MTI
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

CDCS-3

Post by maalsma » Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:39 pm

Credit means any arrangement, however named or described, that is irrevocable and thereby constitutes a definite undertaking of the issuing bank to honour a complying presentation.

A credit is irrevocable even if there is no indication to that effect.

So I thinks D is correct.

A. Ahmed

abrar
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:52 am
First Name: Abrar
Last Name: Ahmed
Organization: Crown Agents
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

CDCS questions

Post by abrar » Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:14 pm

"A credit is irrevocable even if there is no indication to that effect" This is not intended to imply that a revocable credit cannot be issued, but simply, that unlessthe LC indicates that it is revocable, the credit is deemed to be irrevocable. This is opposite to the stance under UCP500.

The answer is D because of the use of the word "amended" in A & B, and because of the fact that it is subject to UCP600, requiring the issuing bank to follow process under Article 10. This thefeore, excludes A & B as possible answers.

C must also be excluded,because the statement is patently incorect.

Therefore, ( although the process is not prescribed under UCP600) the only possible answer is D

cmzr
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:52 am
First Name: cem
Last Name: OZER
Organization: tibas
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: turkey

why?

Post by cmzr » Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:33 am

Dear abrar,

I could not understand your explanation. First of all revocable credits are not coverd in UCP 600. As a result, Can 10th article applied to a revocable credit?

Also why a revocable credit can't be amended while it can be cancelled? I think cancellation is the biggest and the most crucial amendment in its own. In addition to that, the last edition of official book of cdcs indicates on page 91 that:
".... The second key elemet is that a revocable documantary credit may be amended or cancelled by the issuing bank:

at any moment
without prior notice to the beneficiary."

Other comments are welcomed

pablo
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:33 am
First Name: pablo
Last Name: rabizi
Organization: none
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

ucp600

Post by pablo » Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:56 am

IMHO only establishing the basis under which a credit can be revoked, i.e. using the words of art 8 ucp500, the rule of art 3 will be modified.

leekaiyin55
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:37 pm
First Name: Lee
Last Name: Kai Yin
Organization: DB
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Hong Kong

UCP 600 (revocable LC)

Post by leekaiyin55 » Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:40 am

Dear Pal,

My opinion is that revocable LC is not recommended & encouraged under the concept of UCP600 as it may defeat the spirit of LC. Therefore the design of UCP600 is intentedly not for revocable LC which if so issued might create certain confusion & unanticipated argument in case of dispute.

In the event that an advising bank is asked to advise such revocable LC, it is recommended not to advise the same but inform the sending party and the reason in above paragraph. As the LC issuing bank, they should explain the matter to LC applicant & explore the reason behind and/or ture intention of the parties to see if there is other solution/ instructment best fits their needs.

Rgds

abrar
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:52 am
First Name: Abrar
Last Name: Ahmed
Organization: Crown Agents
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

CDCS - 3

Post by abrar » Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:17 am

"First of all revocable credits are not coverd in UCP 600. As a result, Can 10th article applied to a revocable credit?"

Revocable credits are not catered for under UCO600, but nevertheless, a bank is not precluded issuing such a credit under UCP600. It would follow, that if subject to UCP600, the credit ( revocable or otherwise) must follow the rules set out thereunder.

"Also why a revocable credit can't be amended while it can be cancelled? I think cancellation is the biggest and the most crucial amendment in its own. In addition to that, the last edition of official book of cdcs indicates on page 91 that:
".... The second key elemet is that a revocable documantary credit may be amended or cancelled by the issuing bank:

at any moment
without prior notice to the beneficiary."


I suggest ( however impractical this may be) UCP600 rules must be adhered to, even in the case of a revocable LC, if it is subject to the Rules. Therefore, without proper qualification or modification to the Rules, the fact the credit may be stated to be Revocable, may have limited effect in being able to exercise the revocation.

As regards the extract from the CDCS guide, does the guide indicate that such actions may be exercised even if the credit is subject to UCP600?

cmzr
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:52 am
First Name: cem
Last Name: OZER
Organization: tibas
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: turkey

revocable credit under ucp 600

Post by cmzr » Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:50 am

Guide indicates as follow: " Revocable documentary credits are rarely used and are not covered in UCP 600. The documentary credit specialist should, however, be aware of the functions of a revocable documentary credit...." and defining the characteristic of revocable credit. There is not a definite answer to your question abrar. But I presume that book defines revocable credit which is subject to UCP 600.

honey0101
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:49 am
First Name: Sudhakara
Last Name: Reddy
Organization: HDFC Bank Ltd
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: India

When applicable

Post by honey0101 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:03 am

It is clear revocable credits are not covered under UCP600 To Get the revocable credit under the UCP600, it is very important to define under what conditions of the revocability. Once this is defined we can relate the other terms with UCP 600

msullah123
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:20 pm
First Name: Mohammed Shahid
Last Name: Ullah
Organization: IBBL
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

Revocable lc

Post by msullah123 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:12 pm

I think right answer is C.

omar
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:44 am
First Name: omar
Last Name: bahader
Organization: NSGB
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: EGYPT

b

Post by omar » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:51 am

b is the right one

bosnia
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:00 am
First Name: Renata
Last Name: Martinovic
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina

Revocable LC

Post by bosnia » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:55 pm

B is correct one

FARAH
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:47 pm
First Name: Farah
Last Name: Shaikh
Organization: ZENITH BANK (UK) LTD
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: UK

Answer - multiple choice questions for CDCS -3

Post by FARAH » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:58 pm

Hi,

In my opinion the answer is D. UCP 600 does not cover Revocable LCs. However if such LCs are issued than as per my understanding option D can be considered.

Thanks

User avatar
kimsindberg
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:52 pm
First Name: Kim
Last Name: Sindberg
Organization: Nordea
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Denmark

A reference seems needed :-)

Post by kimsindberg » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:06 pm

:-?

Reference:
Professor James E. Byrne:
“The Comparison of UCP600 & UCP500”
page 48 -
# 12. Revocable Credits under UCP600.

Best regards
Kim

www.remburs.com

pallavi204
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:22 pm
First Name: pallavi
Last Name: magji
Organization: bank of america
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: hyderbad

Post by pallavi204 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:07 pm

what is the correct answer for the above

User avatar
shafi865
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:26 pm
First Name: S. M. Shafiqur
Last Name: Rahman, CDCS
Organization: Southeast Bank Ltd.
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

Revocable LC

Post by shafi865 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 11:03 pm

Hi !
So far my knowledge goes-
1) Option A is wrong .
2) Option B is partially correct, but it does not mention the issue regarding consent of the beneficiary.
3) Option C is correct
4) Option D states must, I have an objection about the word must.

So I am going for Option C.

But I have a question, is it possible to issue revocable LC subject to UCP 600?

Regards,
Shafique

Post Reply